Elsevier

Diabetes & Metabolism

Volume 40, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 1-14
Diabetes & Metabolism

Review
Persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: A review of the epidemiological evidence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2013.09.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The prevalence of diabetes and obesity has increased rapidly over the last few decades in both developed and developing countries. While it is intuitively appealing to suggest that lifestyle risk factors such as decreased physical activity and adoption of poor diets can explain much of the increase, the evidence to support this is poor. Given this, there has been an impetus to look more widely than traditional lifestyle and biomedical risk factors, especially those risk factors, which arise from the environment. Since the industrial revolution, there has been an introduction of many chemicals into our environment, which have now become environmental pollutants. There has been growing interest in one key class of environmental pollutants known as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and their potential role in the development of diabetes. This review will summarise and appraise the current epidemiological evidence relating POPs to diabetes and highlight gaps and flaws in this evidence.

Introduction

The last few decades have seen epidemics of diabetes and obesity, which are not fully explained by changes in the prevalence of established risk factors, such as physical inactivity and poor diet [1]. In fact, the reasons for the extremely rapid increase in diabetes and obesity over the past few decades remain unclear. Given this, there has been a thrust to look more widely than traditional lifestyle and biomedical risk factors. One key avenue of novel risk factors are those arising from the external environment. Since the industrial revolution, we have introduced many chemicals, (intentionally and unintentionally) into our environment and while these are many and varied, there has been growing interest in the potential health effects of particular environmental toxicants such as persistent organic pollutants (POPs).

Persistent organic pollutants are a class of compounds, which are characterised by their ability to persist in the environment, their low water and high lipid solubility and their bio-magnification in the food chain [2]. POPs include many of the first generation organochlorines (OC), pesticides such as dieldrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), toxaphene and chlordane, and several industrial chemical products or by-products including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD), dibenzo-p-furans (PCDFs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) such as perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). Given the large number of POPs which have been identified, a nomenclature has been derived based on the number of halogenated atoms that each compound has. Each individual POP is referred to as a congener and the name of a congener specifies the total number of halogenated substituents and their position. It is believed that POPs with fewer chlorine atoms persist in the environment for less time and are less toxic [3]. Many of these congeners have been and continue to be used in large quantities in chemical and related industries and now represent a global health problem [4].

POPs are either used as pesticides or generated as by-products of industrial or combustion processes. Dioxin, a key class of POPs, is produced as a by-product in the bleaching of paper products and during certain types of chemical synthesis [5]. POPs can travel great distances and become widely distributed by wind and can end up in countries other than those in which they were produced [6]. Once in the environment, POPs accumulate in the fatty tissue of living organisms, reaching the greatest concentrations at the top of the food chain in fish, mammals and predatory birds [7]. Although humans can be exposed to POPs through direct exposure, occupational accidents and the environment, most of the human exposure nowadays is from the ingestion of contaminated food as a result of bioaccumulation in the food chain. The main source (around 95%) of POPs intake is through dietary intake of animal fats [2].

The mechanisms linking POPs exposure to diabetes have not been fully elucidated, but several pathways have been proposed. In vitro and in vivo experiments show that TCDD affects glucose homeostasis by reducing glucose uptake by adipose tissue, liver and the pancreas, which is accompanied by decreases in insulin production and secretion by beta cells. The primary mechanism by which these effects are proposed to occur is via the binding of TCDD to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) [8]. This binding causes changes in translational and transcriptional mechanisms resulting in decreased glucose transporter (GLUT) expression [9], [10], [11]. TCDD has also been suggested to affect pancreatic nitric oxide synthase, the function of which is not yet understood [12], and it has also been shown to increase expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) α [13], which linked to insulin resistance. The effects of other POPs such as PCBs are less studied although Baker et al. [14] showed using mice studies that coplanar PCBs cause rapid and sustained impairment of glucose and insulin tolerance through an AhR-dependent mechanism associated with an adipose-specific increase in TNF-α expression.

Further, some of the POPs act as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC). EDCs bind to nuclear receptors such as androgen receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and estrogen receptor (ER) α and β. This binding, often at high affinity, can interfere with the synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, action, or elimination of a range of hormones in the body that are responsible for normal cell metabolism. For example, the E2 receptor is involved with the maintenance of insulin sensitivity. Abnormal binding to this receptor by the EDC may promote insulin resistance [15]. Further PPAR α, which has a role in fatty acid synthesis, is activated in vivo by PFOA but the in vivo consequences of this appear to be species specific and thus remain controversial. Similarly, dioxins and pesticides can modulate PPAR activity, although little is known about the molecular mechanisms and physiological output from this binding [15].

Most of the current epidemiological data linking POPs to disease is related to dioxins, which have been suggested to be the most toxic pollutant [3]. In a range of animal experiments, TCDD, the most toxic of all dioxins, has been linked to many severe adverse effects including cancer, liver disease and diabetes. Since the 1990s, evidence has accumulated associating POPs with diabetes, high blood glucose levels, insulin resistance and obesity [5]. Such evidence has arisen from occupational cohorts exposed during work or chemical accidents, cohorts who are at high-risk of exposure due to consumption of contaminated fish, and general-population studies. While the data are accumulating in this area, there are conflicting reports and thus a review of the diverse information sources is needed. This review will summarise and appraise the current evidence relating POPs to diabetes and highlight gaps and flaws in the evidence.

Section snippets

Methods

PubMed, OVID (Medline) and Web of Science databases were searched to identify potential studies published from 1950 to March 2013. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms ‘diabetes’, ‘insulin resistance’, and ‘glucose intolerance’ were combined with the operator ‘OR’. The MeSH term ‘persistent organic pollutant’, ‘polychlorinated biphenyls’, ‘organofluorine’, ‘organobromine’ and ‘organo pesticides’ were entered and combined with the former using the operator ‘AND’ and the search was limited to

Results

After removal of duplicate studies and reviews, our search identified a total of 388 publications. Review of reference lists identified an additional 8 articles. Among these, a total of 74 articles were identified as potentially eligible and were reviewed in full text (DJM, VHYL) and 41 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review.

The characteristics and results of the studies reviewed for this work are summarised in Table 1 and Table S1 (Table S1; see

High-risk occupational cohorts

Some of the earliest data linking POPs with diabetes come from occupational cohorts studies, where exposure to pollutants occurred in relation to employment. The most well known of these is the study of US veterans of Operation Ranch Hands from the Vietnam war [16]. During the war, veterans were exposed to Agent Orange, which contained the dioxin TCDD. Compared to age, race and occupational-matched controls, cases of diabetes had average levels of POPs three times higher after ten years

Non-occupational high-risk population studies

Many studies of POPs exposure and diabetes have been performed on populations who are at increased risk of POPs exposure because they consume large amounts of fish or live near to heavily polluted areas. Other than occupational exposure, the most common source of exposure to POPs is via dietary intake of foods from animals such as seafood [26]. In a study of 352 Native American Mohawk (high consumers of fish from the St Lawrence River) adults  30 years of age who were tested for PCBs, p,p’-DDE

General population studies

The data showing a link between POPs and diabetes from general, population-based studies mainly comes from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Lee et al. used the 1999–2002 NHANES data and investigated the relationship of type 2 diabetes (defined using fasting glucose) with PCB 153, two dioxins (HCDD and OCDD), oxychlorane, p,p’-DDE and trans-nonachlor. They showed that 80% of participants had detectable levels of these chemicals and diabetes was strongly

Prospective studies

Prospective data on POPs and diabetes are limited. In a nested case-control study of diabetes with 20 years follow-up from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) cohort, Lee et al. [3] showed a non-linear relationship between POPs and diabetes. This study reported unusual findings. First, some individual POPs displayed statistically significantly highest ORs of diabetes in the second quartile. In addition, upon summing 31 POPS including trans-nonachlor, oxychlordane,

Discussion

In general, the majority of evidence reviewed in this study from occupationally exposed, high-risk populations, and general-population studies is consistent with an independent relationship between POPs exposure and diabetes.

The data from studies of occupational cohorts exposed to dioxins and diabetes are suggestive of a link between diabetes and dioxin exposure. The notable exceptions to this are the studies of US workers from NIOSH. Some of the limitations, which may influence these

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

Acknowledgements

D.J.M is supported by the Victorian Cancer Agency Public Health Fellowship.

V.H.Y.L is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Project Grant (1022923).

J.L.H is supported by an APA scholarship and a Baker IDI top-up scholarship.

J.E.S is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship (586623).

References (61)

  • J.-W. Chen et al.

    Relationship between insulin sensitivity and exposure to dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls in pregnant women

    Environ Res

    (2008)
  • O. Hue et al.

    Plasma concentration of organochlorine compounds is associated with age and not obesity

    Chemosphere

    (2007)
  • E.J. McAllister et al.

    Ten putative causes of obesity

    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr

    (2009)
  • D.H. Lee et al.

    A strong dose-response relation between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: results from the National Health and Examination Survey 1999–2002

    Diabetes Care

    (2006)
  • D.H. Lee et al.

    Dose of some persistent organic pollutants predicts type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study

    Environ Health Perspect

    (2010)
  • R. Airaksinen et al.

    Association between type 2 diabetes and exposure to persistent organic pollutants

    Diabetes Care

    (2011)
  • R.B. Remillard et al.

    Linking dioxins to diabetes: epidemiology and biologic plausibility

    Environ Health Perspect

    (2002)
  • Unites States Environment Protection Agency

    Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Global Issue, A Global Response

    (2013)
  • E. Enan et al.

    TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-P-dioxin) causes reduction in glucose uptake through glucose transporters on the plasma membrane of the guinea pig adipocyte

    J Environ Sci Health B

    (1992)
  • J.E. Michalek et al.

    Serum dioxin, insulin, fasting glucose, and sex hormone-binding globulin in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (1999)
  • N.A. Baker et al.

    Coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls impair glucose homeostasis in lean C57BL/6 mice and mitigate beneficial effects of weight loss on glucose homeostasis in obese mice

    Environ Health Perspect

    (2013)
  • C. Casals-Casas et al.

    Endocrine disruptors: from endocrine to metabolic disruption

    Annu Rev Physiol

    (2011)
  • J.E. Michalek et al.

    Diabetes mellitus and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin elimination in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand

    J Toxicol Environ Health A

    (2003)
  • G.L. Henriksen et al.

    Serum dioxin and diabetes mellitus in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand

    Epidemiology

    (1997)
  • H.K. Kang et al.

    Health status of Army Chemical Corps Vietnam veterans who sprayed defoliant in Vietnam

    Am J Ind Med

    (2006)
  • M. Cranmer et al.

    Exposure to 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is associated with insulinemia and insulin resistance

    Toxicol Sci

    (2000)
  • G.M. Calvert et al.

    Evaluation of diabetes mellitus, serum glucose, and thyroid function among United States workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

    Occup Environ Med

    (1999)
  • M.H. Sweeney et al.

    Review and update of the results of the NIOSH medical study of workers exposed to chemicals contaminated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin

    Teratog Carcinog Mutagen

    (1997)
  • K. Steenland et al.

    Dioxin and diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the combined NIOSH and Ranch Hand data

    Occup Environ Med

    (2001)
  • M.P. Montgomery et al.

    Incident diabetes and pesticide exposure among licensed pesticide applicators: Agricultural Health Study, 1993–2003

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2008)
  • Cited by (96)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text